Can you call your Android Device … an "Android Device"… Just Like That?
Fresh and interesting article:
There’s no such thing as a stupid question… Although this question
may seem to be targeting just a few companies desiring to build a device
compatible with a given Android version, it may also give you a short overview
on how Google is using Android as a trademark.
As you can read on Wikipedia, Android, Inc. was founded in
Palo Alto, in October 2003, by 4 persons: Andy Rubin (co-founder of Danger),
Rich Miner (co-founder of Wildfire Communications, Inc.), Nick Sears (once VP
at T-Mobile), and Chris White (headed design and interface development at WebTV).[1]
In November 2007, just a few months after the original and revolutionary iPhone
came out [2],
the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) was announced. On September 23, 2008 the
current leading smartphone platform in the world was launched as an open source
project.
As you know, Android falls into two categories: the open
parts from the AOSP, which are the foundation of Android and are available on
free and open source software licensing terms, and the closed source parts,
which are all the Google-branded apps (Gmail™, Maps™, YouTube™, Google™ Calendar,
Google™ Camera, Google™ Hangouts, Google™ Now, Google Play Store™, etc.) [3].
In other words, it is technically possible to build a device without signing
any individual license agreement with Google Inc (even though your apps may look
terribly old) [4].
For instance, Nokia will launch a new device “Nokia Normandy” (most probably
during the press event on February 24, 2014) that “will run a modified version
of Android that doesn't include Google services like Gmail, Google Maps, and
the Google Play store for Android apps and other content. That means Google
won't generate any revenue from Nokia's phone, even though the operating system
is based on Android”[5].
So, yes, it is possible to call your Android device … an "Android
Device"… just like that. Well, that’s not entirely true … To be able to call it
an Android device, a phone manufacturer needs a license from Google Inc, called
a Mobile Application Distribution Agreement (“open source licenses cover
software copyright, they may come with patent provisions, but licenses like the
GPL or ASL (Apache) don't involve trademarks”[6]).
As you can see in the (long) illustrative, non-exhaustive list of trademarks
owned by the Company, Android™ is one of them [7].
It is important to use a mark correctly. Indeed, “rights to a trademark can
survive indefinitely if an owner continues to use a mark to identify its goods
and services. If trademarks are not used properly, they may become weak or
lapse-putting one of the company's most important assets at risk. Rights may be
lost not only by a trademark owner's improper use of its mark, but also by
improper use of the mark by third parties or the public” [8].
If you would like brand features for other Google products
(such as the little green robot), you should check out the product-specific
guidelines below provided by Google Inc [9]:
Android in text
·
Android™
should have a trademark symbol the first time it appears in a creative.
·
Android
should always be capitalized and is never plural or possessive.
·
"Android"
cannot be used in names of applications or accessory products, including
phones, tablets, TVs, speakers, headphones, watches, and other devices. Instead
use "for Android".
o
Incorrect:
"Android MediaPlayer"
o
Correct:
"MediaPlayer for Android"
If used with your logo, "for Android" needs to be smaller in
size than your logo. First instance of this use should be followed by a TM
symbol, "for Android™".
·
Android
may be used as a descriptor, as long as it is followed by a proper generic
term.
o
Incorrect:
"Android MediaPlayer" or "Android XYZ app"
o
Correct:
"Android features" or "Android applications"
Any use of the Android name needs to include this attribution in your
communication:
Android is a trademark of Google Inc.
Android robot
The Android robot can be used, reproduced, and modified freely in
marketing communications. The color value for print is PMS 376C and the online
hex color is #A4C639.
When using the Android Robot or any modification of it, proper
attribution is required under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
license:
The Android robot is reproduced or
modified from work created and shared by Google and used according to terms
described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.
You may not file trademark applications incorporating the Android robot
logo or derivatives thereof. We want to ensure that the Android robot remains
available for all to use.
Android logo
The Android logo may not be used. Nor can this be used with the Android
robot.The custom typeface may not be used.
So, no, it is not possible to call your Android device … an "Android
Device"… just like that.
Follow me on Twitter @tdubuisson or check my
professional profile on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasdubuisson
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_%28operating_system%29
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4OEsI0Sc_s
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[3] http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/10/googles-iron-grip-on-android-controlling-open-source-by-any-means-necessary/3/
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[4] http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/02/googles-once-secret-restrictive-android.html
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[5] http://www.businessinsider.com/nokia-android-phone-2014-2#ixzz2taQ2z4jC
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[6] http://www.fosspatents.com/2014/02/googles-once-secret-restrictive-android.html
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[7] http://www.google.com/permissions/trademark/our-trademarks.html
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[8] http://www.google.com/permissions/faq.html
(last visited February 17, 2014).
[9] http://developer.android.com/distribute/googleplay/promote/brand.html
(last visited February 17, 2014).
Comments
Post a Comment